From one standpoint (and it was also his own) he was a fail- ure. From another, he was a success, though largely a posthu- mous one. His failure lay in disappointed ambitions, in his inability to live up to the family tradition. He felt—this is a major motif in the
The critic Paul Elmer More has decried its "sentimental nihilism," and it is true that AdamsJs special brand of pes- simism sometimes strikes tediously on the ear. Yet, when one looks about at the world today, it is hard to find many writers who foresaw as clearly as Adams did the shape of the future. We have experienced several of the catastrophes he foretold; and it is clear that we are to experience others. Disintegration rather than coherence seems more and more to mark our era. It required a considerable depth of imagination to say in 1862, as Adams did, "Some day science may have the existence of mankind in its power, and the human race may commit suicide by blowing up the world."
Henry Adams was by nature a rather unhappy man, and his beloved wife's suicide in 1885 further predisposed him to pes- simism. He was snobbish, intellectually cocky, vulgarly racist, and his self-depreciation is often spurious. Yet from these weaknesses as well as from his strengths he drew the materiais that make the
C.F.
94
THOMAS HARDY
1840-1928
Thomas Hardy came of Dorset stock and lived the larger part of his life just outside Dorchester. The beautiful, history- freighted, and rather desolate countryside around Dorchester (Hardy calls it Wessex) is in a way the main character in his novйis. His formal education—he was the son of a builder— lasted only from his eighth to his sixteenth year. He was then apprenticed to a Dorchester, and later to a London, architect. At twenty-seven he started what turned out to be a quarter- century of increasingly successful novel writing. The indigna- tion aroused by supposedly shocking situations and passages in
It may be some time before the cycle of taste returns Hardy to favor, just as it has brought back Dante [30], Conrad [100], Stendhal [67], Melville [83], and Henry James [96]. This Plan, however, is not designed to take more than casual account of fashion. It deals mainly with writers of generally acknowledged
long-term influence and interest. Among these Hardy will doubtless occupy a secondary rank. But not a minor one.