pdf/taming%20the%20e-mail%20monster.pdf?hsCtaTracking=
a6b8dec3-ccff-4202-982e-d2363877ef01%7C6bd3eafd-
bcb9-42b8-a463-2d1ef2bd913e
Charles R. Stoner, Paul Stephens, Matthew K. McGowan, Connectivity and work dominance: Panacea or pariah?, Business Horizons, Volume 52, Issue 1, Jan/Feb 2009, pp. 67–78. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681308001298
Google’s Chief Works to Trim a Bloated Ship. CLAIRE CAIN MILLER. The New York Times. 9 Nov 2011.
Effects of e-mail addiction and interruptions on employees, Laura Marulanda-Carter, Thomas W. Jackson, (2012) Journal of Systems and Information Technology, Vol. 14 Iss. 1, pp. 82–94.
Toward taming the monster in electronic mail. Demiridjian, Z. S. (2005). The Journal of American Academy of Business, 7, pp. 1–2.
“The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologyproductivity obal Institute, 2012. http://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/
dotcom/Insights%20and%20pubs/MGI/Research/
Technology%20and%20Innovation/The%20social%20
economy/MGI _The_social_economy_Full_report.ashx
The cost of e-mail within organizations. Jackson, Thomas W., Ray Dawson and Darren Wilson. Strategies for eCommerce Success (2002): 307.
The cost of email within organizations. Jackson, Thomas W., Ray Dawson, and Darren Wilson. Strategies for eCommerce Success (2002): 307.
The effects of interruptions on task performance, annoyance, and anxiety in the user interface. Brian P. Bailey, Joseph A. Konstan, John V. Carlis. Proceedings of INTERACT (2001). Volume: 1, Publisher: Citeseer, pp. 593–601.
On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Brian P. Bailey, Joseph A. Konstan.Computers in Human Behavior Volume 22, Issue 4, July 2006, pp. 685–601.
Reducing the disruptive effects of interruption: A cognitive framework for analysing the costs and benefits of intervention strategies. Deborah A. Boehm-Davis, Roger Remington Accident Analysis & Prevention. Volume 41, Issue 5, Sen 2009, pp. 1124–1129.
Understanding e-mail interaction increases organizational productivity. T. Jackson, R. Dawson, D. Wilson. Communications of the ACM, 46 (2003), pp. 80–84. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=859673
“You’ve Got E-Mail!” … Shall I Deal With It Now? Electronic Mail From The Recipientow? Electronic Mail From The Judith Ramsay, Mario Hair. International Journal Of Humanario Hair Interaction, 21(3), pp. 313–332.
E-mail training significantly reduces email defects, International Journal of Information Management, Anthony Burgess, Thomas Jackson, Janet Edwards, Volume 25, Issue 1, Feb 2005, pp. 71–83.
Цитируется по “Tipping Sacred Cows” by Jake Breeden, John Wiley & Sons 2013.
“A Pace Not Dictated by Electrons’: An Empirical Study of Work without E-Mailirical Study of Work withoutards Armand Cardello. https://students.ics.uci.edu/~svoida/uploads/Publications/Publications/markvoida-chi12.pdf
Driving While Distracted. Nationwide. 2008.http://www.nationwide.com/pdf/dwd-2008-survey-results.pdf?
NWOSS=survey+2008&NWOSSPos=1State of the Nation of cell phone distracted driving. http://www.nsc.org/safety_road/Distracted_Driving/
Documents/State%20of%20the%20Nation.pdf
www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/nti/pdf/811555.pdf
Promoting the Car Phone, Despite Risks. By Matt Richtel. New York Times. 6 Dec 2009.
Drivers and Legislators Dismiss Cellphone Risks. Matt Richtel. New York Times. 19 July 2009.
BlackBerry cuts made roads safer, police say. Awad Mustafa and Caline Malek “The Natoinal” UAE, 15 Oct 2011. http://www.thenational.ae/news/uae-news/blackberry-cuts-made-roads-safer-police-say
http://www.nhtsa.gov/Research/Human+Factors/Naturalistic+ driving+studies
Reducing Distracted Driving: Regulation and Education to Avert Traffic Injuries and Fatalities. Lawrence O. Gostin. Peter D. Jacobson. 303 JAMA 1419–1420 (2010). http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/380
A Comparison of the Cell Phone Driver and the Drunk Driver. David L. Strayer, Frank A. Drews and Dennis J. Crouch. Hum Factors 2006; 48; 381. http://www.psych.utah.edu/abclab/publications/
distraction/Strayer(2006)%20-20A%20comparison%20of%20the%20
cell-phone%20driver%20and%20the%20drunk%20driver.pdf
Engrossed in conversation: The impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance, Kristen E. Beede, Steven J. Kass, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Volume 38, Issue 2, March 2006, pp. 415–421.
Driver Safety Impacts of Voice-to-Text Mobile Applications. Christine E. Yager. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Sen 2013, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 1869–1873.
Influence of personal mobile phone ringing and usual intention to answer on driver error, Carol Holland, Versha Rathod, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Volume 50, Jan 2013, pp. 793–800.
A Comparison of the Cell Phone Driver and the Drunk Driver. David L. Strayer, Frank A. Drews and Dennis J. Crouch. Hum Factors 2006; 48; 381. http://www.psych.utah.edu/abclab/publications/distraction/